Glencore PLC Slips On Mixed Production Report

Shares of the mega-miner Glencore PLC (LON:GLEN) ease after it reports higher production for copper but lower volumes for zinc and nickel.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Rio TintoGlencore (LSE: GLEN) shares eased 3% to 365p this morning after it reported a mixed bag of production numbers for the first half of the year.

Copper bottomed

Copper, its major profit source, saw production rise 13% to 741,000 tonnes thanks to a ramp-up at its Mutanda operation and improved production at Collahuasi. Due to the company’s production profile, higher volumes are expected in the second half of the year than the first.

Ferrochrome production was up 16%, but there was less good news when it came to zinc, down 11%, and nickel, 8% lower. Two zinc mines depleted their reserves in June 2013, and some of Glencore’s nickel operations have been placed on care and maintenance.

Energised

On the energy front, coal production was up 5%, but oil production rose 41%, due to two operations only coming on line during 2013.

Glencore also re-confirmed that the sale of its Las Bambas copper mine had been completed, which will net the company a cool $6.5 billion after tax.

All eyes now turn to Glencore’s detailed half-year results, which are due for release a week today. Like many of the major miners, Glencore releases summary production figures first, followed by full financial figures shortly afterwards.

Despite today’s share price slip, Glencore is trading at around its highest level since early 2013. Its forecast P/E and dividend yield are 17 times and 2.8% respectively.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Stuart Watson has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »