Should You Buy GlaxoSmithKline plc Or AstraZeneca plc?

After releasing disappointing results today, is GlaxoSmithKline plc (LON: GSK) still a better buy than AstraZeneca plc (LON: AZN)?

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

GlaxoSmithKlineIt’s been a disappointing year thus far for investors in GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) (NYSE: GSK.US), with shares in the pharmaceutical company being down 6%. This does not compare favourably to the wider market (the FTSE 100 is up 1%), nor to sector peer, AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) (NYSE: AZN.US), which is up 23% having benefited from bid approaches from Pfizer.

A Challenging Quarter

Indeed, GlaxoSmithKline’s results released today showed that the company is struggling to come to terms with declining dales for its blockbuster inhaler, Advair. The removal of Advair from the reimbursement list of the US’s biggest prescription manager, Express Scripts, compounded falling sales for its omega 3 medicine, Lovaza, which is experiencing high levels of generic competition. The overall effect of this, as well as ongoing issues with regards to alleged bribery in China, has been a 4% reduction in revenue and a 12% fall in profit (after currency effects are removed).

A Different Story at AstraZeneca?

Meanwhile, sector peer AstraZeneca is also experiencing difficulties at present. Its patent cliff is in full-swing, with earnings for the full year expected to be 15% lower than last year, followed by a further 3% fall next year. This is in contrast to GlaxoSmithKline, which now expects flat earnings this year, with the market forecasting a rise of 9% next year.

However, investors are focused on the longer term for AstraZeneca, with the company’s strategy of acquisition in order to overcome its patent woes proving popular among investors. For GlaxoSmithKline, though, the focus is on a much shorter timeframe and the company’s enviable drugs pipeline is not the key motivator for investors right now when, in fact, it could be argued that it should be. That’s because it will be GlaxoSmithKline’s pipeline that will be the main driver of the company’s future growth.

Looking Ahead

Despite GlaxoSmithKline’s update being disappointing today, it continues to offer better growth prospects, a better valuation and a better yield than AstraZeneca. For instance, GlaxoSmithKline trades on a price to earnings (P/E) ratio of 13.5, while AstraZeneca’s P/E is 17.6. The two companies’ yields, meanwhile, are 5.4% (GlaxoSmithKline) and 3.8% (AstraZeneca), again highlighting that GlaxoSmithKline is the more attractive investment at the present time.

Certainly, the allegations regarding bribery in China are causing a certain amount of share price weakness, as are doubts regarding the loss of patent protection on key, blockbuster drugs. However, GlaxoSmithKline has a strong pipeline, growth potential, a top-notch yield and is trading at a significant discount to a key peer in AstraZeneca. As such, it appears to be a great buy at present with a bright long-term future ahead of it.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Peter Stephens owns shares of AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline. The Motley Fool recommends GlaxoSmithKline.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »