One Reason Why AstraZeneca plc Is A Risky Bet

It’s tough for AstraZeneca plc (LON:AZN) shareholders, argues Alessandro Pasetti.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

AstraZenecaThe shares of AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) (NYSE: AZN.US) trade well above fair value — and that’s become even more apparent this week.

AbbVie Bids For Shire

AbbVie (NYSE: ABBV.US)’s latest cash-and-stock proposal for Shire (LSE: SHP) indicates that Astra shareholders still hoping to receive a Pfizer (NYSE: PFE.US) bid — and one largely financed by cash — will likely end up being disappointed.

Along with the take-out price, the cash component of Pfizer’s latest proposal for Astra, which was rejected in late May, turned out to be the sticking point in the Pfizer/Astra saga. The cash portion was simply too low to convince Astra management to engage with Pfizer.

Hostile Takeovers

In deal-making, hostile takeovers heighten execution risk for the acquirer, yet Pfizer may decide to approach Astra shareholders by the end of the year. Astra stock is essentially flat since takeover talk vanished. Either way, Astra shareholders won’t get the deal they had hoped for, in my view. If Pfizer agrees to pay up — say, ÂŁ60 for each Astra share — it will offer more than 50% of the purchase price in its own stock to finance the transaction.

Incidentally, there’s also a chance that Pfizer will look elsewhere to secure a “tax-inversion” deal. Hence, Astra offers little upside right now.

AbbVie/Shire: A Benchmark Deal?

The final stock/cash split that eventually emerges from the AbbVie/Shire deal will be a benchmark for large transactions in the pharmaceutical world. 

Shire said on Monday that it was willing to recommend a ÂŁ31bn proposal from AbbVie. The US company’s revised proposal stands at ÂŁ53 per share, and includes a ÂŁ24 cash portion, while the reminder is represented by AbbVie shares. AbbVie is willing to pay only 45% of the full price in cash. A firm offer has yet to be made but, should it emerge, it will likely carry a similar cash/stock split.

On 19 May, the board of Astra rejected Pfizer’s final proposal, which comprised “£24.76 in cash (45%) and 1.747 Pfizer shares (55%)” for each Astra share, for a value of £55 per Astra share based on the closing price of Pfizer shares on 16 May.

Mating Game

Pfizer stock has gone nowhere since the American company decided to walk away. If Astra executives are right, and their long-term projections are flawless, Astra shareholders will be rewarded without Pfizer. That’s unlikely, in my view.

Pfizer needs Astra more than Astra needs Pfizer, but Astra stock now trades well above fair value, and still prices in an M&A premium. If Pfizer doesn’t make a comeback with a blown-out offer, Astra shareholders will be the ultimate losers. 

Elsewhere, there are striking similarities between some financials reported by Astra in 2000 and its trailing figures for the 12 months ended on 31 March 2014. Of course, Astra has changed over the years, but back then its stock traded at around ÂŁ36. The unaffected share price of Astra was about ÂŁ36 in early January, too. Value will be delivered only if a takeover emerges, and it may not be on very convenient terms….

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Alessandro Pasetti has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Shire and GlaxoSmithKline.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »