1.5 Reasons Why AstraZeneca plc Is A Perilous Income Pick

Royston Wild looks at why AstraZeneca plc (LON: AZN) is a hazardous investment choice.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

In this article I am looking at why I believe AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) (NYSE: AZN.US) is a shaky selection for those seeking reliable dividend prospects.

Diddly dividend coverage casts a heavy cloud

AstraZeneca has been a high-risk stock pick for some time, as loss of exclusivity across key products and a bare pipeline for the next couple of years at least is likely to keep earnings underwater. So although City analysts expect the business to resume dividend growth from this year, with dividend coverage of just 1.5 times prospective earnings through to the end of 2015 I believe the firm’s payout prospects are on extremely thin ice.

The pharma play is expected to push the full-year dividend higher this year and next, with a payment of 280 cents in 2013 expected to rise to Cash286 cents this year and 288 cents in 2015.

Still earnings declines to the tune of 14% and 3% in 2014 and 2015 respectively, to 433 US cents and 420 cents, cast doubts over whether the firm will be in a position to raise the dividend. Indeed, a backdrop of persistent earnings pressure has forced the firm to keep the payment fixed for the past two years, so further payment stagnation cannot be ruled out.

At face value, a handy improvement to the firm’s capital position — operating cash flows rose to $7.4bn last year from $6.9bn in the prior 12 months — should shore up investor confidence in the firm’s dividend outlook.

But the cash-intensive nature of R&D across the pharma space, combined with AstraZeneca’s extensive restructuring and lab-building programme in place set to continue during the next few years, is likely to put a strain on the firm’s balance sheet and potentially hamper payout growth.

And the company’s dividend yields for this year and next can hardly be described as trailblazing, with a readout of 3.8% for both 2014 and 2015. Although comfortably above the FTSE 100 forward average of 3.2%, this figure is made to look ordinary when tallied up against a corresponding reading of 5.2% for industry rival GlaxoSmithKline.

For more optimistic stock selectors, AstraZeneca’s expected earnings improvement this year and next — the drugs giant saw earnings plummet 26% last year by comparison — could be viewed as a momentous event for the firm’s long-term growth and income prospects, as the effect of patent expiration across key products becomes less problematic for the bottom line.

But considering the firm’s fragile dividend coverage, I believe that at present the risks for income investors outweigh the potential for bountiful rewards.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

> Royston does not own shares in AstraZeneca. The Motley Fool has recommended shares in GlaxoSmithKline.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »