One Reason Why I Wouldn’t Buy AstraZeneca plc Today

Royston Wild explains why AstraZeneca plc (LON: AZN) is a poor growth selection.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Today I am looking at why I consider AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) (NYSE: AZN.US) to be vastly overpriced.

A pricey pick given its paltry earnings potential

The effect of exclusivity losses across key products has weighed heavily on AstraZeneca for what seems like an age now. And these woes are set to persist, forecasters say, with the firm expected to follow last year’s 26% earnings decline with a 15% fall in 2014. A further 3% drop anticipated for next year suggests that a return to earnings growth will remain elusive for some time to come.

These figures mean that the pharma play currently changes hands on a P/E rating of 17.7 for 2014, and which worsens further to 18.2 for 2015. These figures fall outside the watermark of 15 or below which represents reasonable value, territory in which I feel the firm should be comfortably rooted given its meagre revenues prospects.

And AstraZeneca’s premium relative to its competitors also suggest that the company could be in line for a significant share price correction.AstraZeneca GlaxoSmithKline boasts a prospective P/E multiple of 15.3, while Smith & Nephew — although dealing on a corresponding readout of 20.8 — has a solid record of earnings growth behind it, and which is predicted to punch expansion to the tune of 15% this year alone.

AstraZeneca received a boost earlier this month when it announced that its peripherally-acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist (or PAMORA)class of drugs — which includes the potentially earnings-driving Movantik product — will not require cardiovascular testing from the US Food and Drugs Administration (FDA), removing a critical pre-launch barrier.

Earlier in the month the drugs giant announced that its oncology pipeline was delivering stellar testing results, particularly for its AZD9291 and MEDI4736 tumour-battling experimental products. Indeed, the firm hopes to roll-out the former for regulatory approval in the US as soon as the first quarter of 2015.

Even though the firm should be applauded for these achievements, AstraZeneca’s R&D efforts are not expected to deliver strong enough revenues to replace those lost as a result of patent expiration for some years yet.

And given the unpredictable nature of product roll-outs as testing setbacks bite, there are no guarantees that AstraZeneca will be able to get many of the next generation of mooted earnings drivers to market in the first place.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

> Royston does not own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool owns shares in Smith & Nephew, and has recommended shares in Glaxo.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »