What Should AstraZeneca plc Shareholders Learn From Failed Pfizer Bid?

AstraZeneca plc (LON:AZN) shareholders should be happy, despite Pfizer’s failure, says Roland Head.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

The last few weeks have been a fantastic opportunity for AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) (NYSE: AZN.US) shareholders. If you’re unhappy with the failure of the Pfizer bid, then I’m afraid it’s probably because you failed to take advantage of this opportunity.

AstraZenecaLet me explain.

Mega-cap deals like the Pfizer-AstraZeneca situation are controlled by company boards and a handful of large institutional investors.

As private investors, we have no influence whatsoever — but we can often profit from these situations, as the public and long-winded nature of many takeover negotiations gives us the opportunity to choose which outcome we’d prefer.

In my view, this is exactly what happened with the AstraZeneca bid.

1. Cash out

AstraZeneca’s share price traded between £46 and £48 for three weeks. During this period, AstraZeneca shareholders had the chance to cash out.

Several institutional investors chose this option, including (reportedly) Neil Woodford‘s former employer, Invesco.

Although the share price didn’t quite match Pfizer’s bid, shareholders could sell immediately for cash, removing the risk that the deal would fall through, and avoiding being lumbered with Pfizer shares in part payment.

2. Lock-in a higher income

For income investors, selling AstraZeneca  would have been a smart move, in my view.

In a previous article, I explained how investors could have locked in an income boost of up to 170% by selling their AstraZeneca shares, and reinvesting the proceeds in GlaxoSmithKline.

3. Backing the board

Shareholders could have decided, like top fund manager Woodford, that Astra’s long-term prospects are worth more than £55. Yesterday, Mr Woodford said that he’d opposed the bid, and backed AstraZeneca’s board in its rejection of Pfizer’s proposals.

Warning signs

Shareholders who wanted to sell, but held out for a higher price, were taking a gamble on Pfizer’s success.

Admittedly, this is the first time Pfizer has failed in a takeover bid, but there were warning signs. Pfizer’s share price fell by 8% between April 30, when the bid was announced, and last Friday. This made it hard for Pfizer’s board to fund a higher bid, as the value of the shares they were offering AstraZeneca kept on falling.

What next?

Under UK takeover rules, Pfizer is prohibited from making another offer following its final proposal, unless AstraZeneca’s board decide to back the £55 proposal, or a second company makes a higher bid. Both seem unlikely.

I suspect AstraZeneca shares will continue to drift lower, as the bid premium evaporates, and the firm’s valuation returns to normal.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

Roland owns shares in GlaxoSmithKline but not in any of the other companies mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool has recommended shares in GlaxoSmithKline.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »