The Hidden Nasty In BP plc’s Latest Results

BP plc (LON:BP) delivered a crowd-pleasing dividend hike in its first-quarter results, but the news wasn’t all good.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

This week’s first-quarter results from BP (LSE: BP) (NYSE: BP.US) weren’t too bad, but they concealed a surprising number of hidden nasties that may have escaped your notice.

Shale bites dust

The big oil majors haven’t been able to profit from North American shale in the way that some smaller firms companies have BPmanaged to do. Last year, Royal Dutch Shell reported a $2bn impairment on its US shale assets, and earlier this year, the Anglo-Dutch firm reported a further $631m write-down on its US shale assets.

BP has now followed suit, and reported a $521m impairment on its Utica shale acreage, where the firm has decided not to proceed with development plans.

Legal costs

BP reported that the total ‘cumulative net charge’ for the Gulf of Mexico spill remained unchanged at $42.7bn during the first quarter of this year, as it continues to contest business loss claims it believes are unfounded.

However, this ‘cumulative net charge’ doesn’t tell the whole story. During the first quarter of 2014, BP’s cash expenditure on costs related to the Gulf of Mexico spill rose to $600m — double the $300m spent on spill-related costs during the first quarter of 2013.

BP’s legal costs could remain very high for several more years, especially as the final stage of BP’s Clean Water Act court case has now been postponed, and won’t start until 20 January 2015.

Russian profits down

BP’s 20% stake in Russian oil giant Rosneft has become even more controversial in recent weeks as tensions have risen in Ukraine, and Rosneft’s CEO, Igor Sechin, is now the subject of US sanctions.

BP reported that its share of Rosneft’s underlying profits fell to $271m during the first quarter of this year, down from $1,087m during the fourth quarter of last year. The decline was partly due to the weakening rouble, and partly due to BP’s accounting for its Rosneft stake, which provided a one-off ‘favourable effect’ in the fourth quarter of 2013.

Is BP still a buy?

Of course, investors didn’t care about any of this when BP’s results were published — BP shares rose by 1% in early trading, after investors saw that the firm had increased its quarterly dividend to 9.75 cents, a 2.6% increase on last year’s fourth-quarter payout.

In my view BP is still a buy for income, and looks good value on a forecast P/E of 10, and a prospective yield of 5.0%.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

> Roland owns shares in Royal Dutch Shell but does not own shares in BP or Rosneft.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »