3 Hazardous Reasons To Steer Clear Of AstraZeneca plc

Royston Wild looks at why AstraZeneca plc (LON: AZN) is an exceptionally risky stock selection.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

shire

Today I am looking at why I believe AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) (NYSE: AZN.US) is on course to endure lasting earnings weakness.

Patent problems continue to pummel revenues

AstraZeneca has taken an age to satisfactorily address the problem of patent expiration across many of its critical products, a crushing millstone on group turnover. Indeed, the drugs giant announced earlier this month that the loss of exclusivity on previous earnings drivers — which includes the likes of Seroquel IR, Atacand, Nexium and Merrem — drove revenues 8% lower during 2013 to $25.7bn. This in turn pushed operating profit 54% lower to $3.7bn.

The prospect of further patent troubles has prompted AstraZeneca to warn that it expects “a low-to-mid single digit percentage decline in revenue at constant exchange rates for 2014,” a result which is likely to cause core earnings per share “to decline in the teens.”

Paltry pipeline unlikely to offer near-term respite

AstraZeneca continues to chuck vast amounts of capital into its R&D operations in order to rectify its ailing revenues, and spent $1.43bn on new product development last year, up 8.3% from 2012.

The company is also hoovering up pharma companies across the globe to offset shortfalls in its organic product development. AstraZeneca bought out Bristol-Myers Squibb’s stake in their diabetes-combating joint venture just this month, while other major purchases over the past year include respiratory specialists Pearl Therapeutics and lipids experts Omthera Pharmaceuticals.

Although such measures have helped to boost the pipeline — 11 products entered Phase III trialling last year versus just six in 2012 — the route from laboratory to store shelf is of course a bumpy one which can take many years to complete. Indeed, chief executive Pascal Soriot warned that revenues will only recover to last year’s levels by 2017 as the exclusivity saga rumbles on.

A relatively expensive valuation

Still, investors have been unperturbed by these concerns, and AstraZeneca’s share price has shot almost 15% higher since the middle of January. But in my opinion this leaves the firm at the mercy of a severe price correction, particularly considering the superior strength of its pharmaceutical rivals.

Indeed, AstraZeneca now deals on a P/E rating of 15.6 for 2014, an expensive choice when compared against GlaxoSmithKline which currently trades on a multiple of 15.1 and has a much more bubbly product pipeline and consequently superior earnings prospects.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

> Royston does not own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool has recommended shares in GlaxoSmithKline.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »