Why GlaxoSmithKline plc Should Be A Candidate For Your 2014 ISA

GlaxoSmithKline plc (LON: GSK) should be rewarding shareholders for years to come.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

GlaxoSmithKlineSo GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) (NYSE: GSK.US) has struggled a bit with the so-called patent cliff in recent years with the loss of exclusivity on some key drugs, has it?

When it comes to picking investments for this year’s new ISA allowance of £11,760, I say “So what?

Decades of cash

The reason, you see, is that for me an ISA investment is for life — and I’m far more interested in how a company is going to be shaping up over 10, 20 or even 30 years than in short-term trifles like this.

Of course, we can’t be sure any company is going to be doing well so far in the future. But with a market capitalisation of more than £80bn and as the largest pharmaceuticals company listed on the FTSE by far (AstraZeneca is £30bn behind), GlaxoSmithKline surely has a much better chance than smaller companies in more risky businesses.

Beaten by technology?

What’s that, you say? The days of blockbuster drugs companies are numbered and they’ll be eclipsed by modern biotechnology upstarts? Well, who do you think has the big money and will be making irresistible buyout offers to these newcomers when they start to look promising?

That’s right, it’s the big firms like GlaxoSmithKline. In fact, we can already see the start of it, as Glaxo has been on the acquisition trail for some time now.

And, you know, even the shorter term looks pretty reasonable for Glaxo right now.

Not expensive

We’ve seen erratic earnings per share (EPS) over the past few years and EPS should be flat in 2014, but there’s modest growth of 8% forecast for 2015. That puts the shares on a price-to-earnings ratio of around 14-15 over the next couple of years — in line with the FTSE’s long-term average of about 14, and a bit below the current forward average of 17.

And when we look at Glaxo’s dividends, which provide a yield of around 5% when the FTSE 100 average stands at 3%, the shares are looking attractively-priced to me.

So how much would £1,000 invested in Glaxo be worth in 20 years time?

The value of compounding

_ISA1If we assume the share price will grow in line with the FTSE’s long-term average of around 5% per year and that we reinvest a dividend yield of 5% in more shares each year… we’d be looking at £6,700 after two decades!

To put that into perspective, the same cash in a savings account offering a typical 1.7% would net you a measly £1,400.

In fact, I like GlaxoSmithKline so much I have it in the Fool’s Beginners’ Portfolio, which is run very much with the same long-term strategy that I advocate for ISA investors.

RISK WARNING: should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice. The Motley Fool believes in building wealth through long-term investing and so we do not promote or encourage high-risk activities including day trading, CFDs, spread betting, cryptocurrencies, and forex. Where we promote an affiliate partner’s brokerage products, these are focused on the trading of readily releasable securities.

> Alan does not own any shares in GlaxoSmithKline or AstraZeneca. The Motley Fool has recommended shares in GlaxoSmithKline.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Publish Test

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP P-Press Update Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test as Author

Test content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post 2

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Test PP Status

Test content. Test headline

Read more »

Investing Articles

KM Test Post

This is my content.

Read more »

Investing Articles

JP Tag Test

Read more »

Investing Articles

Testing testing one two three

Sample paragraph here, testing, test duplicate

Read more »