Life is not easy for the big supermarkets. Consumers have been constrained for cash for years now. Not only have they less money to spend, theyâve also been skipping the âbig fourâ in favour of cheaper fare from the likes of Aldi and Lidl. Falling spending and declining footfall are not a happy combination.
At the same time, many commodity costs have risen over the past few years, and price increases are hard to pass on to those cash-strapped consumers. Energy bills have remained stubbornly high, too.
At least supermarkets are among the few who can cheer the low wage growth weâve seen recently, although youâve got to feel for their employees.
Space evaders
A bigger existential threat is online shopping. You might expect sellers of carrots and cucumbers to be fairly immune to this, but big retailers like Tesco long ago diversified to sell everything from flatscreen TVs to school uniforms. That boosted sales in the good times, but it has also made them vulnerable to the same pressure from online as other bricks-and-mortar retailers like department stores.
Tesco has responded by pulling much of its electrical wares off the store floor to sell them online. But in turn thatâs made the hypermarkets that were proliferating under Tescoâs ubiquitous banner a few years ago suddenly seem rather over-sized.
At the other end of the scale sits Morrisons (LSE: MRW) (NASDAQOTH: MRWSY.US). It doesnât have the big space issue of Tesco â but it also doesnât have the vast armada of local convenience stores rolled out by its rivals, and it has only just launched its online offering.
So while Tesco contemplates radical action like acquiring Mothercare to fill its voids, Morrisons would probably prefer the latter to go bust so it might pick up new sites cheap like it did after the demise of Blockbuster and HMV.
Make money from property
The irony is that while Morrisons has a property estate thatâs fairly fit-for-purpose — compared to Tesco, which has those huge stores to deal with — its terrible trading recently has put it on the radar of activist investors who smell blood, and perhaps value.
You see, Morrisons owns around 90% of its stores, warehouses and offices (as well as its own abattoirs!) This property is worth ÂŁ9-ÂŁ10billion. Yet with a share price a little over 250p, Morrisons is valued at less than ÂŁ6 billion.
You donât need to be Warren Buffett to see an opportunity here. Theoretically Morrisons could be acquired, all the property sold, and investors could pocket ÂŁ3 billion for their troubles.
In reality that wonât happen — for a start, whoâd buy all those supermarkets, if not Morrisons? Plus while the supermarket is having a tough time —Â sales plunged a breath taking 5.6% over Christmas — itâs still a profitable enterprise with millions of loyal customers.
Finally, Morrisons has debts as well as assets, although it also has cash and inventory that would go some way to covering its obligations.
Hedge funds hunting
But thereâs a more realistic way to get at the value locked in Morrisons property portfolio. One reason it still owns so much property is that it hasnât done what Tesco did years ago, which is to sell off lots of square footage to a third-party and then leaseback the space as a tenant.
This might seem rather circular, except that in theory Morrisons should be better at being a grocer than a landlord, and being a grocer should be more profitable, too. Therefore spinning off the property should â in theory â unlock value, which could either be returned to shareholders as cash or used for reinvestment.
There are rumours that Morrisonsâ CEO will announce something along these lines in the next few months, but the idea has already attracted hedge funds keen to make sure he does. Activist investor Elliott Associates has taken a stake, as has Sandell Asset Management, the US fund agitating for a breakup of FirstGroup.
Taste the difference
What about Sainsbury’s (LSE: SBRY) (NASDAQOTH: JSAIY.US)? Itâs arguably winning the war among the big four, cheering investors by posting a modest increase in like-for-like sales over Christmas.
Yet I donât think Sainsbury can rest on its laurels. Despite its superior performance it trades on roughly the same P/E ratio (around 11) and dividend yield (very close to 5%) as Morrisons. I think this implies investors see the same pressures weighing on both companies.
Sainsbury has been active in managing its property portfolio. In November it took a ÂŁ92 million write-down on the value of sites where it no longer plans to erect supermarkets, and it expects to open two new convenience stores a week in 2014. All in, it pegs the value of its property portfolio at ÂŁ11.8bn, which is again way in excess of its ÂŁ7bn market cap, although as with Morrisons thereâll be other assets and liabilities complicating the picture.
Sainsburyâs trading momentum and the easier pickings at Morrisons may keep activists away for now, but I still think thereâs value hidden away in its bricks and mortar. Perhaps more likely given the strength of its business in fact is an all-out acquisition if a predator smells a bargain.
Dividends today, gains tomorrow
In 2007 Sainsburyâs share price approached ÂŁ6 on a bid from Qatar Holding. Qatar remains the largest shareholder with a 26% stake, and with the share price languishing at ÂŁ3.67 I could easily see Qatar trying again.
Smaller fry like us might be tempted simply to buy a basket of these cheap supermarkets. After all, youâre getting a dividend yield of around 5%, so youâre effectively being paid to wait for activists to successfully shake things up and unlock some capital gains, too.